Roland Garros ATP: Stan Wawrinka vs Arthur Fils

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket is pricing Stan Wawrinka vs Arthur Fils at about 14% for Wawrinka on the current USDC market, with the outcome settled via conditional tokens on Polygon. That implies Fils is the clear favourite, and the contract should move mainly on whether the match is actually played and who advances, rather than on any broader tournament narrative. Because the market resolves 50-50 if the match is not played, or if it is delayed beyond the seven-day window without a winner, traders also need to account for scheduling risk, not just on-court form.

The odds sit in line with the age-and-ranking gap: TennisTemple lists Wawrinka, 41 and ranked 119, against Fils, 21 and ranked 19. Roland-Garros and the ATP have both highlighted the pairing as a first-round match to watch, with the official site describing it as a “blockbuster” and the ATP noting that Fils will face Wawrinka in round one. That context matters because Wawrinka remains capable of taking sets in best-of-five on clay, but Fils is the more established tour-level player and the market is reflecting that edge.

The main catalysts are straightforward: confirmation that the match starts on the scheduled date, any revised order-of-play, and whether either player carries a late fitness issue into Paris. Roland-Garros has already framed the tie as a notable opening-round fixture, so any disruption to the draw or court schedule would matter for the 50-50 fallback. If the match is completed, the contract settles on the player who advances; if it is interrupted and later awarded, the advance decision still determines the token outcome.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Roland Garros ATP: Stan Wawrinka vs Arthur Fils on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.