Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Alex Molcan vs Felix Gill

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket’s contract is effectively pricing this Roland Garros qualifying match at 0% for a side, which means the market is saying the current USDC on Polygon conditional tokens do not yet reflect a meaningful expectation of a winner being locked in. The underlying event is straightforward: Alex Molcan is due to face Felix Gill in the French Open qualifying draw, and the market resolves to the named player who advances. With the settlement window running to 27 May, the key practical point is whether the match is played to completion, or whether it slips into the fallback 50-50 outcome if it is postponed too long or never gets under way.

For context, Molcan and Gill are both listed for the second qualifying round, with match pages from Sofascore, Flashscore and ATP showing the fixture as scheduled, while ESPN’s listing indicates Gill advanced through his first qualifying match and was set to meet Molcan on 20 May. Head-to-head references are thin, which is common in early-round qualifying where pricing can remain sparse until line-ups firm up and starting probabilities get refreshed. In these markets, 0% usually reflects a lack of active liquidity rather than a settled view on the tennis itself, so historical reads are better taken from schedule certainty and draw status than from the headline probability alone.

The main catalysts are administrative rather than speculative: whether Roland Garros qualifying proceeds on schedule, whether either player withdraws, and whether the match is completed before the seven-day deadline that would trigger the 50-50 fallback. Tournament scheduling updates, walkovers, and any injury or fitness news will matter more than pre-match talk. For traders watching the contract on Polymarket, the relevant dependency is not just who is stronger on paper, but whether the conditional token can actually settle on an on-court result within the market’s window.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.